VRML 2.0 FINAL Polling Results
March 18, 1996
- How would you rate your interest in the ActiveVRML proposal? (181 votes
counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 14 (8%)
- Moderately in Favor: 32 (18%)
- Neutral: 27 (15%)
- Moderately Against: 43 (24%)
- Strongly Against: 65 (36%)
- How would you rate your interest in the Dynamic Worlds proposal? (116 votes
counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 12 (10%)
- Moderately in Favor: 30 (26%)
- Neutral: 46 (40%)
- Moderately Against: 17 (15%)
- Strongly Against: 11 (9%)
- How would you rate your interest in the HoloWeb proposal? (128 votes counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 6 (5%)
- Moderately in Favor: 30 (23%)
- Neutral: 48 (38%)
- Moderately Against: 27 (21%)
- Strongly Against: 17 (13%)
- How would you rate your interest in the Moving Worlds proposal? (191 votes
counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 130 (68%)
- Moderately in Favor: 45 (24%)
- Neutral: 7 (4%)
- Moderately Against: 6 (3%)
- Strongly Against: 3 (2%)
- How would you rate your interest in the Out of this World proposal? (139
votes counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 15 (11%)
- Moderately in Favor: 18 (13%)
- Neutral: 41 (29%)
- Moderately Against: 33 (24%)
- Strongly Against: 32 (23%)
- How would you rate your interest in the Reactive Virtual Environment proposal?
(44 votes counted)
- Strongly in Favor: 1 (2%)
- Moderately in Favor: 1 (2%)
- Neutral: 10 (23%)
- Moderately Against: 15 (34%)
- Strongly Against: 17 (39%)
- In which proposal are you most stongly in favor? (186 votes counted)
- ActiveVRML: 18 (10%)
- Dynamic Worlds: 11 (6%)
- HoloWeb: 5 (3%)
- Moving Worlds: 138 (74%)
- Out of This World: 14 (8%)
- Reactive Virtual Environment: 0 (0%)
Footnote #1, the names of those who voted.